Zalenski and Raspa speak to the success of the research stating, “Maslow’s framework provides a comprehensive approach not only for achieving comfort at end of life-through the relief of symptoms and addressing of fears and safety issues-but for a self-actualization that can be achieved in the last parts of the journey. ![]() Researchers clearly adapted the five levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to palliative care environments – including:ġ.) Distressing symptoms of pain and dyspneaĢ.) Working with patient fears regarding physical safety, dying and abandonment.ģ.) Working with: love, acceptance and affection in the face of debilitating illnessĤ.) Work with esteem and respect needs in the interior and exterior environmentsĥ.) Experiences of actualization and transcendence in the face of death and/or serious illness Based on the data, researchers concluded that quality of life, mood, and affect were significantly greater among patients receiving palliative and standard oncologic care concurrently.Ĭomplimenting this, researchers Zalenski and Raspa from the Department of Emergency Medicine and Palliative Care in Michigan, found statistically significantly results for palliative and hospice care environments when implementing the motivation and needs theories of Abraham Maslow. At the twelve week mark, the quality of life and mood were assessed in the study participants through a variety of scales and instruments. The patients chosen for the study were randomly assigned to one of two groups palliative care with standard oncologic care or standard oncologic care alone. Published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the study on palliative care looks at 151 patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, and early palliative care intervention. More, research is proving that humanistic methods of care are the source of success humanistic psychologist Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is being used as the foundation patient care and treatment. The Wall Street Journal reports that palliative care saves Medicaid an average of 6,900 per seriously ill patient research proves that that care is better for mood, affect, and survival. Leave it to Dr.Palliative care has proven more cost effective and more care-oriented for seriously ill Medicaid patients. The commentariat from within The Wall Street Journal, responsible for more than one unapologetically controversial and outrageous editorial after another in recent months, is increasingly becoming an albatross around the paper's neck. This period has been comprised of four interminably long wilderness years during which belief and reality have been bound together so tightly by people who ought to know better, that the truth has more often than not been the only guest who hasn’t shown up to the party. Its nadir has come in tandem with the onset of the Trump era, which itself has been nothing if not the apotheosis of a decades-long assault on truth in America. ![]() The WSJ’s opinion section is unquestionably crying out for improvement at the moment. Barron, an early owner of our company, said, ‘Everything can be improved.’” “If we want to grow to 5.5 million digital subscribers, and if we continue with churn, traffic and digital growth about where they are today - it will take us on the order of 22 years.”Įlsewhere, the report continued, “As Clarence W. ![]() “Here’s the bottom line,” the report reads. The former, including end users and ordinary people affected by the news stories in question, appear in only about a quarter of the newspaper’s articles, per this report. Also, that reporters ought to quote more “real people” in stories, as opposed to clubby, inside-baseball, expert voices. Those problems included racial news not being sufficiently covered, because WSJ reporters are apparently skittish about pitching ideas to editors. Needless to say, such internecine warfare within the newspaper’s ranks - and spilling onto the pages of the printed product, no less - is an extraordinary turn of events.Īs if that wasn’t enough, the paper also saw a leaked report from within the newspaper itself, which had been circulated among the paper’s leadership, diagnose a number of critical flaws at the institution before it leaked to the public. It was only a couple of months ago when we saw reporters on the news side of The Journal produce a news story that pushed back against a piece prepared by The Journal’s own opinion section, which itself purported to reveal a corruption scheme and shady dealings involving Biden, his son Hunter, and various shadowy elements in Ukraine. All of which is to say: The WSJ has a serious problem, and it begins and ends with the paper’s nettlesome opinion section.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |